The primary bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M Sathyanarayanan made the clarifications on a petition filed by Sagayam. The courtroom stated it will cross separate orders, if wanted, because it didn't need to overlap its personal rulings.
The courtroom appointed Sagayam the authorized officer or courtroom commissioner to probe mining irregularities on September 11.
Referring to the truth that Sagayam's identify figured as an office-bearer within the Anti-Corruption Motion, the judges stated if she wished to do public service, he ought to do outdoors his obligations as an IAS officer.
The courtroom additionally refused to entertain a PIL filed by a PMK-affiliated discussion board within the matter highlighting the seashore sand mining menace.
The IAS officer was relieved by the state authorities for the court-assigned job after a rap from the courtroom.
Sagayam later filed the current petition looking for to know whether or not he ought to probe all types of mining in all of the 32 districts in Tamil Nadu or to restrict his work solely to Madurai district.
"I want to know whether or not as per the order of the excessive courtroom, I'm required to examine and report about mining of all main and minor minerals in the whole Tamil Nadu, or ought to I confine the inspection to granite mining in Madurai district alone," Sagayam stated in his petition.
He additionally needed the courtroom's permission to have his chosen set of officers to help him within the probe.
The officer was the primary to show the Rs 16,000 crore granite mining rip-off in and round Madurai.